2. December 2014

 

Starting life as niche technology, costing millions of dollars and used only on high end films, 3D graphics have now become nearly ubiquitous these days.  Still used in movies ( nearly all movies these days ), 3D graphics are used heavily in games, TV, marketing, conceptualization, engineering and much much more.

 

In this particular guide we are going to look at the more popular options out there, with an obvious bias towards gaming.  If you are just starting out and trying to get an idea of what’s available, this should be the perfect page for you!

 

This entire discussion ( and much more I think ) is available as a 56 minute talk in 1080p on YouTube as well as embedded at the bottom of this post.

 

A Quick History Lesson

 

Actually, the big two would probably be more accurate, as Autodesk recently put a bullet in one of these apps.  These are probably the three most used commercial 3D graphics applications, and to really understand them probably requires a bit of a history lesson.  Don’t worry, I’ll keep it brief.

 

Way back in the stone age of computer graphics, there were a handful of really successful 3D applications, but at the forefront were a pair of applications.  One was a product called Power Animator created by a company called Alias ( who became Alias/Wavefront ) which eventually morphed into a project called Maya.  Power Animator was used in such early and high profile 3D movies like Terminator 2 and The Abyss and on early 3D video games like Super Mario 64.  The other major player of the day was a product called Softimage ( the one that just took a bullet actually… ) which was used to make Jurassic Park and the Virtua Fighter series of games.  By no means were they the only players, many others existed such as Nichimen nWorlds, Lightwave and more, but these two were the big players used in big budget movies.

 

A few things started to happen however…  In these early days, the computers capable of running these 3D applications were dedicated workstations like those from Silicon Graphics Inc (SGI) and Digital (DEC).  These machines ran from $10K to $50K and much much more.  3D graphics applications certainly weren’t and neither were the machines that ran them. 

 

There was a movement towards running 3D applications on “mere mortal” machines.  The earlier mentioned Lightwave ran on Amiga’s for example, as did a popular-at-the-time application called Imagine.  But three major things happened to bring 3D graphics to the unwashed masses

 

  1. home computers became less crappy.  OpenGL arrived, 3D cards arrived, processors got faster and memory increased
  2. Autodesk created a program called 3D Studio that ran on DOS.  It was a very small player in the industry (outside of CAD that is), but opened 3D up to a world of people that never had access.
  3. Microsoft released Windows NT and wanted to move into the 3D market, so they did what they did and bought it.  That is, they bought Softimage and ported it to Windows.  Coupled with companies like Intergraph releasing workstation class PCs and the rise of the video card, they succeed.

 

Fast forward a few years and many amazing things happened.  Kinetics became Autodesk ( of AutoCAD fame ) and 3D Studio became 3D Studio Max, moving from DOS to Windows.  In fact, Windows is now the new home of 3D.  SGI is fast becoming a fading memory and all the major applications have been ported to Windows.  Then a wonderful thing happens… prices all start to fall!  A version of Maya and Softimage are available for under $1,000 and free game focused versions are available of Softimage ( Mod Tool ) and 3D Studio ( GMax ).  3D had truly started coming to the masses.

 

Enter Autodesk.  There was a LOT of consolidation in the industry…  Alias and Wavefront merged to form Alias/Wavefront, Microsoft purchased Softimage and eventually sold it to Avid.  In the end, Autodesk purchased both Avid and Alias resulting in all three major 3D applications being owned by a single company.  Almost over night the price wars predictably enough ended, and the prices went up.  That said, it hasn’t all been bad.  These days, for students and educators anyways, the entire Autodesk suite is available for free.  There is also a game focused version of Maya available, which we will discuss shortly.  So in some ways, 3D has become a great deal more expensive and a great deal cheaper all at once.

 

So, that brings us to today.

 

The Big Three… Er… Two

 

In commercial studios, be it for games, TV or movies, the same three products are the ones most encountered:

3D Studio MAX

Maya

Softimage Xsi

 

As I mentioned earlier, after a very long and successful run, Softimage is being put out to pasture.  Softimage 2015 was the most recent, and final, release ever.  Obviously if you are just starting out today and need to pick a package, Softimage is no longer a good choice.

 

That leaves Maya and Max to choose from.  Traditionally 3D Studio Max was strongest in games, with many game developer friendly features ( excellent plugin system, ability to build your renderer into Max, great low polygon tools, good texturing tools, etc ), while Maya was known more for Film and TV, with animation certainly being it’s strong suit.  That all said, it’s become more and more common to see Max used for film work and Maya used for game work, so the old stereotypes don’t really hold.

 

Actually, being under the same rough has leads to a convergence of sorts.  Over time the feature list of the two products is quickly becoming virtually identical.  As have the keyboard shortcuts, even the file formats are standardizing ( FBX, read more about it here if interested ).  With each new release, each product is starting to feel more alike than different.

 

Of the two, I personally prefer Maya, although the mouse heavy UI drives me nuts.  3D Studio MAX is just getting so long in the tooth that it’s massively in need for a major overhaul.  I first used Max when it was initially released and frankly the Max of today is very very very similar.  Same UI, even a lot of the same tools, tools that have long since been obsoleted.  This is just cluttering things up and making the learning curve higher.  Maya was the result of a complete re-write on the other hand, so the code base is much newer with less years of cruft.  The menus though, those mouse heavy radial menus…  ugh.  Of course, this is all personal opinion.

 

At the end of the day, Max and Maya are your two safe choices if you want a job in the industry.  Max probably has an edge for getting you into a game studio, while Maya probably has an edge getting you into a film studio.  At the end of the day though, they are owned by the same company, speak the same language and are often both used.

 

Neither however is cheap.  3D Studio MAX is $3,675.  Interesting fact, it’s always been that price… even during the 3D application price wars, Autodesk never dropped their price.  The big difference is you can now lease monthly or annually, for $185 / month or $1470 / year.  Maya is now the exact same price as Max ( see how they are becoming more and more similar… ) down from a pricetag of about $5K last year.  Softimage was around the same price.  I’m not sure if you can even buy it anymore, if you can, Autodesk sure don’t make it easy.

 

Oh yeah, Max is Windows only, while Maya is available on Windows and Mac.  If you are a Mac user, that’s a pretty important tidbit of info, no?

 

Maya for Indie Developers

 

Last year, Autodesk took a step towards courting the indie game developer market with the release of Maya LT.  This is a stripped down version of Maya that targets indie game developers specifically.  It is priced at $30 a month, or $795 to purchase a perpetual license (with, I believe, one year of support).

 

So, the obvious question is, what’s stripped out?  Initially the limitations really sucked…  polygon caps, no scripting support, it was pretty much crippled.  Over time though they revisited things and made up for some of the glaring mistakes.  The big areas that are cut are Visual FX stuff and most of the renderers.  This means, if for example, you wanted to create a pre-rendered cutscene, you couldn’t.  The animation features have also been stripped back, leaving mostly the stuff you would use for real-time games.

 

At the end of the day Maya is really only suitable for modeling and rigging game assets or possibly level creation/design.  That said, for a great many game developers, that’s all you actually use it for.  For a full breakdown of Maya vs Maya LT features, you can check here.

 

 

The 900lb Open Source Gorilla in the Room

 

If you are sitting here thinking 4 grand?!?!?!??! OUCH!

 

Well, meet Blender.

 

Blender started life as an in-house 3D tool for a company called NeoGeo… yeah, not the NeoGeo game console, but instead it was the Netherlands largest 3D house… or is that haus?  Eventually a company named NaN was formed to “productize” Blender.  NaN died in 2002 and a project was launched to open source the Blender code… in many ways this was one of the first highly successful KickStarter campaigns!  Blender was eventually open sources, the community took it and ran with it and Blender is thriving today.

 

Blender is entirely free and open source.  It’s nowhere near as commonly used commercially as Max or Maya, but it is certainly used, such as for pre-viz work on Spiderman 2.  I would lie though…  the vast majority of commercial games *aren’t* created using Blender.  If you are looking for something to stick on your resume, Max and Maya certainly carry more weight.

 

HOWEVER, and this is where we drop heavily into opinion land for a bit…

 

If you are working on a 3D game and need to create textured, animated, 3D models, Blender is just as capable as 3D Studio Max or Maya, even without factoring in the price tag.  For many years, Blender had a reputation for being chosen solely because it’s free.  Those days are starting to pass however.   Put into the simplest terms, for the last several years I would say with each new release, Blender is the application that is improving by far the most of the three.  Now, you will find all three apps are quite capable, with Maya/Max and Blender all being strong and weak in different categories.

 

Blender used to ( ok… still does ) have a reputation for being hard to use with an unwieldy interface and in many ways, this was quite fair.  Blender followed it’s own idioms and was a VERY keyboard heavy workflow which takes some time to get.  Also, rather bluntly, Blender 2.4’s interface was pretty much terrible.  Blender 2.5 however was a massive rewrite and rework and it really bore fruit.  Then the 2.6 releases improved the rough edges, while 2.7 has a heavy focus on usability, and it’s make a huge difference.  If you haven’t checked out Blender since the 2.4 days you really owe it to yourself to try it again.

 

The single biggest flaw with Blender IMHO, at least as far as game development is concerned, is the file support.  Autodesk owns the FBX format and the COLLADA file format is a bloody mess of complication to the point that nobody really does it all that well.  This means getting assets into and out of Blender can certainly be more of a challenge than using Autodesk products.  This is an area Blender have recently focused their efforts on and the Unreal Engine folks have kicked in some cash toward the effort so hopefully this improves.

 

So, my summary on Blender… it’s honestly an equal to the two Autodesk products, with as I said, it’s strengths and weaknesses.  I also personally think it’s improving at a much greater rate than either of those products.  Of course, it’s also a hell of a lot cheaper.  That said, once you start paying actual salaries, the cost of software licenses quickly become peanuts.  Can you use Blender for your own game project?  Certainly.  Should you?  That depends on you really, but you should certainly try it out.  The functionality is certainly there, with the biggest flaw easily being the content pipeline.  However, if you are a student looking for a job, Max and Maya will certainly look better on a resume.  A great artist will be able to make great art in any three of those tools, and a good studio will hire an artist will a great reel, regardless to the tool it was created in.  That said, at the end of the day, human resources will be looking for Max or Maya on your CV… they will not be looking for Blender.  Which is actually kind of sad.

 

My much shorter summary…  Blender is free and very good, you should certainly give it a look.  Oh, being Open Source… it’s available on basic everything… possibly even your Toaster… although oddly enough, not been ported to iPad.  Seriously, someone really should port Blender to the iPad!

 

 

Sculpting… the new hotness

 

Another major development in the world of 3D is 3D sculpting.  Sculpting is like working in digital clay for quickly creating hyper detailed, very organic meshes.  In in the world of real-time games, this is still quite useful, as high resolution versions of game models are often used to create something called a normal map.  This allows you to use texture maps to fake super high levels of detail.  Another common operation is to sculpt hyper high resolution models, then basically “trace” a lower detailed version over top.  This is a process called retopology.  Now the good news… all three of the above solutions have sculpting built and retopology tools built in.  That said, compared to the tools we are about to discuss, they simply sucks at it.  So it’s becoming increasingly common to see these kinds of applications pop up in studios.  That said, these are more like initial tools in your toolbox, and certainly not where you should start!

 

zBrush

Pixologic’s zBrush is where the whole sculpting movement started and it’s by far the biggest player in the space.  It’s also $800 by the way.  It’s not an end to end solution, it’s designed to do what it does, then passes the results off to a different program ( Max… Maya… Blender… ) for animation, rendering, etc.  For sculpting though, it’s hard to beat zBrush.  You should at least be aware of it’s existence.

 

Sculptris

$800 a little rich for you?  How does free sound?  Sculptris is an interesting project… it actually started life as a fan’s attempt to replicate zBrush.  Said Fan did a pretty damned good job of it, to the point the Pixologic bought the rights and make it available for free.  So go, download it now… even if you don’t ever do anything with it, it’s an amazing amount of fun.

 

Mudbox

Of course you couldn’t be a 3D application without having an Autodesk product, could you?  Mudbox is Autodesk’s offering in the 3D sculpting space.  It started life as a tool used by Weta on King Kong and Lord of the Rings.  Eventually Autodesk bought them and now it’s available for $500 or $10 a month.  In all honesty, that’s the end of my knowledge, I’ve never used Mudbox, nor have I ever talked to an artist that chose it over zBrush.  There is however a trial available, so I really should check it out one of these days…

 

3D Coat

3D Coat is another interesting product out there that focuses on 3D tasks…  Sculpting, 3D Painting and Retopology.  3D Coat is about $400 at full retail.  It is however available on Steam so keep an eye out for amazing discounts.  Be warned, you need the commercial version if you are using 3D Coat for a commercial product.  3D Coat does have a trial available.

 

 

Hey What About _________!

 

 

In all honesty, we just ticked off the major boxes… but of course that was by no means comprehensive.  There are a few other packages you should certainly be aware of, so let’s discuss them now.  These aren’t rated lower for functionality, but simply for popularity.

 

Modo

Modo started life somewhat recently ( by 3D application standards ) as a dedicated 3D modeler.  The company itself was formed by a number of former Lightwave developers and this application has a huge following.  Over time it’s evolved to become much more than a modeler, although it’s still not quite a full 3D suite like Max, Maya or Blender, it’s getting very close.  As the functionality has grown, so to has the price tag.  Currently its 1000Euro.  Animation is a somewhat recent addition to Modo, so the functionality is a bit limited compared to more mature packages.  That all said, Modo has grown in functionality at an amazing rate and is getting quite popular.  There is also a trial available.

 

Lightwave

As I just stated, Modo was formed by a bunch of ex-Lightwave developers.  Lightwave is a once great package that has seemingly lost it’s way and as a result, a great deal of it’s user base.  Lightwave still exists today, there was a new release in 2014, but it seems to be developing at a snails pace and the community around it seems to have mostly disappeared.  Lightwave has been used in a staggering number of TV and Film projects, as you can see here, but the number of recent projects seems to have dried up.  Lightwave costs $1000USD and there is a free trial available.

 

Sketchup

This application is actually used a surprising amount.  It was purchased by Google and used to create 3D models for Google Earth.  Eventually however Google sold it off and it’s a stand alone product again.  Sketchup is available in both a free and commercial version.  At the end of the day, for commercial game dev you will probably need the pro version, which has a $600 price tag.  Sketchup is a 3D modeller only, but damn is it an easy to use one!  For an introduction to 3D modeling, the free version may be the perfect place to start.  You can read more about Sketchup’s use in game design here.

 

Silo

This program is most similar to Modo in functionality and I was a huge fan when it came out.  It’s mostly a modeler that’s gained more features over time, it has a nice low price tag of $109, is cross platform and great to use.  So why the negativity?  Well, the developers basically abandoned it for many years, only recently started working on it again.  I have no idea how much support there is behind this application.  It’s such a shame too, as this product could have been truly great.  There is a trial available and it’s worth checking out, but I wouldn’t rely on too many new features or bugs being fixed going forward.

 

Wings

Wings is an awesome 3D modeler, based heavily on Nichimen Nendo, an awesome 3D modeler that came before it.  It is free and open source and uses a completely different technology called Winged Edge meshes.  Unfortunately it’s also written in a programming language about 4 people on earth use, so when the primary developer stopped supporting it, it effectively died.  It’s still available, and still very cool, but in the last few years it’s stayed still while the world around it got a whole lot better.

 

Cinema4D

This package has quietly existed for years, gaining more and more features and a rabidly loyal user base.  To be honest, I’ve never really got it, especially with a $3,700 price tag.  That said, there must be advantages, as it wouldn’t still exist otherwise.  There is a trial available if you want to check it out for yourself.

 

Houdini

This one has also been around for a very long time and was traditionally used quite heavily for 3D effects in movies.  In all honesty, this is the single most confusing piece of software I have ever tried to use! ;)  It takes a procedural approach to 3D and frankly, I don’t really understand how it works, so I’m not even going to try to explain it.  There is a trial available and Houdini is available for $2000.  They do however have an Indie friendly version available for $200, that is tied to company revenue.  Remember that somewhat famous Dead Island trailer that took the web by storm?  That was created in Houdini.  Again though, this program is very very very weird. 

 

Animation Master

Here is another application that’s quietly been around forever, 1987.  It’s a low cost modeling and animation tool that is based around splines and patches ( most modern modelers are polygonal / subD surfaces ).  Organic models are easy to create, the animation tools are surprisingly comprehensive and the price tag starts at $80.  It’s an interesting package and there is a trial available, but it’s a bit of a pain to get it running. 

 

Shade3D

To be honest, I know almost nothing about this application, even though it’s been around forever.  It’s a full suite 3D package like Max or Maya and they recently released a Unity version.  I tried Shade shortly after that release ( a trial is available ), and the documentation was extremely lacking at the time, so I got pretty much nowhere.

 

Hexagon

A free 3D modeling package made available by Daz.  Reviewed it quite a while back, not a fan.  An advance warning, Daz will spam the ever loving hell out of you if you give them an email address!

 

 

TL;DR

 

So, you got to this point and now you are probably asking… now what?  That’s a lot of options, what should I do???

 

The answer really depends on you and what your goals are.  If you are a student (secondary or post-secondary) and looking to get into AAA 3D for games or film, the answer is pretty much a no-brainer.  Get in the free student program from Autodesk and start learning either Max or Maya.  If it’s games you are most interested in, Max is probably the route to go between the two.

 

If you aren’t a student, or aren’t trying to work on your CV, the answer gets much trickier.  The choice between Maya, Max and Blender on strictly technical merits comes down mostly to the persons opinion and work-style.  If you are working with a large team, or on a free product, Blender quickly becomes a no brainer solution as well.  If you’ve got no budget at all, Blender simply wins by default.  Otherwise I would recommend taking advantage of the free trial, trying out all three and seeing which one has a workflow that fits you.  Just be warned, it’s going to take some time to come to terms with each package.

 

For all others, I saw this.  At least download Blender and Sculptris.  Both are completely free, both are very good and both are excellent places to start.  The skills you learn transfer very well to other packages.

 

The Video Version

 

Art ,

13. November 2014

 

Welcome to the first ever Steam Powered Game Dev review, a look at game development tools available on Steam.  This post looks at FUSE character creator by Mixamo.  In addition to this text review, you can watch the entire thing in video form by clicking right here, or using the embedded player at the bottom.

 

title

Product

Fuse Character Creator

Product Type

3D Graphics Application

Steam Store Page

Website Link

Current MSRP

$99 USD

Steam Discount at Time

75% off

Product Website

Website Link

Available On

Windows, Mac




First let’s start with what Fuse is.   It’s a character creation package, for generating fully textured 3D character models.  If you’ve ever used Smith Micro’s Poser or Daz Studio, you should have a basic idea what to expect.  However, Fuse varies from those packages in some very significant ways.

 

  • It is entirely about character creation, there is absolutely no animation built in.  Don’t worry, this isn’t a big deal as we shall see shortly.
  • It is by far the easiest to use of the three.  Quite literally anyone could use Fuse successfully.
  • It makes for extremely customizable characters, both in regards to model and textures.
  • It has some of the most confusing pricing you will ever see!  ( Actually, Daz is worse! )
  •  

    Character Creation

     

    Let’s jump right in and you can see what I mean.  On it’s surface Fuse is remarkably simple.  You start of by selecting various body parts, like so:

    image

     

    Basically you go through 4 stages.  The first is to build your character model out of body parts.  The above screen shot shows an assembly with a Zombie head selected and torsos being chosen.  Currently for example, there are 34 different torso shapes to be chosen from, ranging from teen cartoon to adult skinny zombie. 

     

    Here is a fully assemble teen female character for example:

    image

     

    You can mix and match body parts however you’d like.  You may be asking at this point… what about creating your own body parts, can you do that?  Yes, you can, I will cover that shortly!

     

    Character Customization

     

    Now that you’ve assembled a basic character by setting the head, arms, torso and legs to use, it’s time to customize.  Simply click the Customize tab and continue, like so:

    image

     

    If you’ve ever played a video game that gave you an incredible amount of control over your character’s creation, you should have some idea of how the process works.  This however goes into a staggering level of detail, with control over pretty much every single facet of your character.  You’ve also always got the Randomize button, which you can simply keep spamming until it spits out something your like.

     

    In addition to using sliders, you can also use the mouse to interactively sculpt the features you want to change, like here with the nose selected:

    image

     

    Clothing your Character

     

    Next it’s time to cloth your character.  One again you simply click the clothing tab.  By the way, you can go back to any of the previous stages at any time if you require.  Clothing works pretty much the same way as character creation:

    image

     

    For each various body part you can choose from a number of different outfits or styles.  If you are wondering, yes, you can give women beards or dress men in thongs if that’s what floats your boat.  There is a decent selection of models available to get started but no doubt you want to know if you can import your own?  Once again, the answer is yes, and once again, we will get to that shortly.

     

    Texturing Your Character

     

    Now that we’ve got a fully dressed 3d modeled character, it’s time to customize the texturing.  This is an area where Fuse absolutely shines!  They have partnered with Allegorithmics to package in their Substance technology for texturing and it’s powerful stuff.  For example, when setting the characters skin texture, here is how it works:

    image

     

    So you can set a basic base skin color, then rapidly modify it using intuitive sliders like “age”, “eye shadow color”, “lipstick” etc.  Plus you have control over the end texture resolution, a critical requirement for games.  You can generate a texture anywhere from 64x64 to 2048x2048.

     

    It’s the sheer volume of controls available for substances that is most impressive, this is just for the skin component:

     

    Video_2014-11-13_145755

     

    You can configure each and every part of your character, using premades like “jean” and sliders like “dirt level” and “age”.  It makes texturing incredibly simple, although there is no option for placing decals or multi texturing right now.  You do however get a fair bit of control over shader performance:

    image

     

    So, essentially that is the process of creating and texturing a full 3D character.

     

    Now it comes to animation, and this is where things get a bit confusing…  but first…

     

    Getting Your Own Content In

     

    As I mentioned earlier, yes, you can import your own body parts and clothing into Fuse, as well as Substances.  However there is a bit of a gotcha, there always is.

    The process is actually quite simple.  You model and UV map in your favorite 3D application, then export in OBJ format, an ancient and simple 3D file format that pretty much every 3D application supports.  However, you do have to follow strict guidelines available here.

     

    Animating Your Character

     

    Although Fuse doesn’t do animation, it’s exactly what the company that make it, Mixamo, does.  Mixamo offers a cloud based animation service and Fuse can hook directly into it.  Basically to get started, you simply click the Animate button when your character is prepared:

    image

     

    Your character will then by automatically uploaded to Mixamo’s servers.  Advanced warning YOU NEED TO HAVE THE UNITY 3D PLAYER ALREADY INSTALLED!

    Otherwise your file will upload then you will get an error.  Pretty stupid that Fuse doesn’t check for it automatically, but c’est la vie.

     

    I’m going to go fairly light on my coverage of Mixamo, as it’s basically a completely different site and service.  You can see a bit more of it in action in the video if you wish.

     

    The basic process goes like this… when you hit Animate in Fuse, your character is uploaded to Mixamo and automatically rigged.  You can then apply different premade animations to your character ( or none at all if you wish ), then download your character.

     

    Here is Mixamo in action creating an animation sequence:

    image

     

    There are hundreds of animations available, some completely free, some for a fee.  We will discuss money in a moment.  Here again you have decent control over your character and you can sequence multiple animations into a single file.

     

    Next you download your file from Mixamo’s server.  Any file your created will be available, so you can re-download to your hearts content.  You simply go to your My Characters” page and select the character to download:

    image

     

    On the download page, you can select in what format you want the file to be downloaded:

    image

     

    You can come back at any time and select a different format, or use different settings.  Now let’s look at the finished project imported into Blender:

    image

     

    The character texture, with bones showing in x-ray mode.  There we have it… a fully rigged, textured character with a walk cycle.  All told it took me about 5 minutes to create this character.

     

    Oh, and you might be wondering, what if I don’t need animation, can I still use Fuse?  Yes, yes you can.  There is an option to export as OBJ format, which again, is available in pretty much every 3D application available.  Of course, the results wont be rigged.  You have a bit of control over the results, but not a ton.  Sadly I couldn’t locate a place to set a polygon budget for example.

    image

     

    I believe it is the simplest way to get a game usable rigged character into a 3D modeling application.  There are other options, Autodesk has their own Character Generator, there’s Make Human and of course Poser and Daz that I mentioned earlier.  Fuse however just hits that sweet spot between ease of use and power that I appreciate so much.  With the exception of the missing Unity Web Player, I encountered no technical issues at all.

     

    There is however the cost…

     

    The Cost

     

    Cost is an interesting subject and can be a bit confusing when dealing with Fuse.  First off, there are two versions of Fuse available on Steam, Fuse Basic and Fuse.

     

    Fuse Basic is a stripped down version, far less body parts, far less character pieces to work with, less textures, etc.  You can however download it completely free, and I encourage you to do so, if only to see if Fuse performs well on your PC.

     

    However, Fuse has one HUGE advantage over Fuse Basic, and something that makes it an incredible bargain.  If you buy Fuse on Steam, you get two free auto rigs a week.  This means that you can have Fuse rig two characters you send to Mixamos server each week.  Now we are about to see the value of Fuse when we look at Mixamo’s pricing.

     

    The are the “bundle plans” on an annual basis:

    image

     

    And here are the “À la carte” prices:

    image

     

    Suddenly those 2 free auto-rigs a week start becoming a hell of a good deal.  The $100 purchase of Fuse on Steam pays for itself after 2 characters are rigged!

     

    What tier you need ultimately comes back to your individual requirements.  Myself, I move at a snails pace, so I highly doubt I will be working on more than two different character riggings per week, plus I am capable of making my own animations if required.  If you are absolutely spitting out characters or use tons of animations however, one of the bundles may be the way to go.  The economics of Fuse Basic though are always bad, especially if you can find Fuse on sale like I did. 

     

    The Video Version

     

     

    Summary

     

    If you need 3D animated characters, Fuse is certainly worth looking at.  With the ability to import any body parts or props into Fuse, you can make pretty much any character you require, assuming you have the ability.  If you have no 3D modeling skill, the breadth of props available in Fuse probably aren’t enough to do everything you need.  If on the other hand you are a great modeler, but terrible animator, Fuse is absolutely perfect for you.

     

    There are a few things I wish that were different.  I wish you had more control over mesh generation and polygon counts specifically.  All told though, I have never encountered a package that enabled me to create animated and actually game usable models anywhere nearly as easy as Fuse does.  I certainly do not regret my purchase.

    Art , ,

    29. October 2014

     

    As part of the ongoing Guide to Creating a Game Entirely on an iPad series, we recently looked at a number of 2D raster and vector graphics programs available onidraw_large_icon iOS.  One of the programs that really stood out was iDraw, a vector drawing program.  I’ve actually used iDraw for a while now, going back to the concept art I did for the Blender tutorial series and I am certainly a fan.  Although both Inkscape (Desktop) and Inkpad (iPad) are available for free, I find both to be pretty unwieldy at times.  iDraw just hits that sweet spot between usability and functionality, at least for me.

     

    In this video I take a more in-depth look at iDraw. 

     

    In this video I show the functionality available in iDraw.  THe first half of the video I complete this game art tutorial that was written for Inkscape, so if you are familiar with Inkscape, you can see how iDraw works at the same task.  If you’ve got no experience with vector graphics at all, this video should certainly give you the basics.   The last half of the video is a tour of iDraw’s additional functionality.

     

     

     

    If you have a Mac or iPad and are looking for a vector graphics solution, iDraw is certainly worth checking out.  iDraw is available for $8.99 on the AppStore for iPad, while it is also available (with almost identical functionality) on the Mac for $24.99.   If you are looking for a tutorial on creating vector graphics, or are looking for more details on using vector graphics for game dev, 2dgameartforprogrammers is a great resource you should check out.

     

    … I still hate the name iDraw though.  I hate an irrational hatred for all iNaming iProducts, I think many others do too!  Get over the name though and you will find an excellent product.

     

    Next up, I will look at using Vector graphics from a Codea code perspective, to see how it’s done and what the performance is like.  Stay tuned!

    Art , ,

    22. October 2014

     

     

    In this tutorial we are going to look at loading and using Tiled TMX maps.  Tiled is a free, open sourced map editor, and TMX is the file format it outputs.  You basically use it to “paint” levels using one or more spritesheets containing tiles, which you then load and use in your game.

     

    Here is Tiled in action, creating the simple map I am going to use in this example:

    image

     

    By the way, I downloaded the tile graphics from here.  Additionally, you can download the generated TMX file we will be using here.

     

    I am not going to go into detail on using the Tiled editor.  I actually covered this earlier here.  For Phaser however, just be certain you export as either JSON or CSV format and you should be good to go.

     

    Now let’s look at some code to load the tile map.

     

     

    /// <reference path="phaser.d.ts"/>
    class SimpleGame {
        game: Phaser.Game;
        map: Phaser.Tilemap;
        
        constructor() {
            this.game = new Phaser.Game(640, 480, Phaser.AUTO, 'content', {
                create: this.create, preload:
                this.preload, render: this.render
            });
        }
        preload() {
            this.game.load.tilemap("ItsTheMap", "map.json", null, Phaser.Tilemap.TILED_JSON);
            this.game.load.image("Tiles", "castle_0.png");
        }
        render() {
    
        }
        create() {
            this.map = this.game.add.tilemap("ItsTheMap", 32, 32, 50, 20);
            this.map.addTilesetImage("castle_0", "Tiles");
    
            this.map.createLayer("Background").resizeWorld();
            this.map.createLayer("Midground");
            this.map.createLayer("Foreground");
            
            
            this.game.camera.x = this.map.layers[0].widthInPixels / 2;
            this.game.camera.y = 0;
    
            this.game.add.tween(this.game.camera).to({ x: 0 }, 3000).
    to({ x: this.map.layers[0].widthInPixels }, 3000).loop().start(); } } window.onload = () => { var game = new SimpleGame(); };

     

    And when you run it… assuming like me you are using Visual Studio 2013 you will probably see:

    image

     

    Hmmmm, that’s not good.  Is there something wrong with our tilemap?  Did we make a mistake?

     

    Nope… welcome to the wonderful world of XHR requests.  This is a common problem you are going to encounter over and over again when dealing with loading assets from a web server.  If we jump into the debugger, we quickly get the root of the problem:

     

    image

     

    Let’s look closely at the return value in xhr.responseText:

    Ohhh. it’s an IIS error message and the key line is:

    The appropriate MIME map is not enabled for the Web site or application.

    Ah…

     

    See, Visual Studio ships with an embedded version of IIS called IIS Express, and frankly, IIS Express doesn’t have a clue what a JSON file is.  Let’s solve that now.  If you created a new TypeScript project in Visual Studio, it should have created a web.config file for you.  If it didn’t create one and enter the following contents:

    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
    <!--
      For more information on how to configure your ASP.NET application, please visit
      http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=169433
      -->
    <configuration>
      <system.web>
        <compilation debug="true" targetFramework="4.5" />
        <httpRuntime targetFramework="4.5" />
      </system.web>
      <system.webServer>
        <staticContent>
          <mimeMap fileExtension=".json" mimeType="application/json" />
        </staticContent>
      </system.webServer>
    </configuration>

     

    Now the code should run without error

    I should take a moment to point out that this is an entirely Visual Studio specific solution.  However, this particular problem is by no means limited to IIS Express.  I documented a very similar problem when dealing with WebStorm’s integrated Chrome plugin.  If your loadJson call fails, this is most likely the reason why!  Well that or you typo’ed it. :)

     

    Ok, assuming everything is configured right,now we should see:

     

     

    By the way, you may have to click on the to get it to start rendering.

     

    Most of the loading code should look pretty familiar by now, Phaser is remarkably consistent in its approach.  There are a few things to be aware of though from that code.  First, the order you create layers in is important.  In Tiled I created 3 layers of tiles.  A solid background layer named “background”, a middle layer with most of the tiles in it called “midground” then a detail layer for the topmost tiles named “foreground”.  Think of rendering tiles like putting stickers on a flat surface… the front most stickers will obscure the ones that are behind them.  The same is true for tiles.  There are other options in tiled for creating foreground and background layers, but I stuck with normal tile layers for ease.  Just no that more efficient options exist.

     

    The next thing to be aware of is when I called addTilesetImage, that is the same image filename that I provided to Tiled.  It is important that you use the same graphics files and names between Tiled and your code.  The next thing worth noticing is the call to resizeWorld() I made when loading the first tiled layer.  This simply set’s the world’s dimensions to be the same size as the tile layer you specified.  Since all the tile layers are the same size, you could have called it on any of them.  Finally, we made a simple tween that pans the camera from one end of the level to the other and back.

     

    There is more to touch on with tiles, but I will have to cover that in later post(s).

     

    Programming , , , ,

    20. October 2014

     

    Now we are going to look at available raster graphics programs available on iPad.  While this post is part of an over all series about creating a game using only an iPad, this post should be of use to anyone looking to create art in general.  The iPad ( and other tablets ) are becoming increasingly viable ways of creating art, especially 2D art.  One major reason for this is cost.  An iPad is generally cheaper than a PC/Mac + graphics tablet, but it’s software costs where this really becomes obvious.  For example, the desktop version of Photoshop ( before it went subscription ) used to cost about $800.  The tablet version of Photoshop… $10!  Another desktop/tablet example is ArtRage, which ( although vastly cheaper ) is available at $50 on Desktop, it is only $5 on iPad.  Granted, they aren’t identical products, and often the iPad version has less functionality, but I tend to find it has all the functionality I generally need.  You mileage may vary.

     

    So we are going to take a look at some of the Raster and Vector packages available on iPad.  Raster and Pixel mean basically the same thing, although “Pixel Art” has often come to represent a very specific style, with fat chunky pixels like from the 8 and 16bit era.  We will also look at two options aimed specifically at this style.  We will also look at Vector graphics packages, which allow you to define brush strokes mathematically, making for nice scalable graphics. 

     

    I have also done a video quickly showing each application running, so you can have a better idea what the experience is like.  I only spend a couple minutes with each, but a few minutes is often all you need to decide if something is right for you or not!  All testing was done on a iPad Air, so if your device is slower, your experience may not be as good.

     

    This video is a quick demonstration of every application mentioned below.  You can view it directly here.

     

     

    Ok, let’s jump right in:

     

    Photoshop Touch

    iTunes Link

    Cost: $9.99

    Screenshot(s):

    Photoshop

     

    Comments:

    Be careful when it comes to the Photoshop products, Adobe have released a number of Photoshop branded iOS projects and most of them are focused on photo manipulation and most useless to you.  The version you want is Photoshop Touch.  This is the mobile version of the venerable desktop Photoshop application.  While certainly stripped from it’s desktop counterpart, it is still impressively capable.

    One immediately useful feature is the allowed canvas size.  Earlier versions where limited in canvas size, while now you can successfully create a 4096x4096 texture, which is the reasonable upper limit of what you will ever want to create.  I will admit though, at this size things can get a bit sluggish at times, although the painting experience is just fine, running tools like magic wand select or applying fx can bring up a wait logo.  Speaking of which, that is two areas where Photoshop really shines compared to it’s peers.  The selection tools are great, including a magic wand, scribble selection, polygon, lasso, etc select and deselect tools.

    Tools are solid but not exceptional.  Feedback is great, there is no lag even on large files.  Navigation takes a bit to get used to, but is quick once you know what you are doing.  It has a few standout tools, such as the clone and heal brushes, which are somewhat rare.  Otherwise you are left with paint, burn, smudge, spray and erase as your primary art tools.  You do however have a ton of fine control over each tool, such as brush patterns, angle, scatter, size, flow and transparency.  You have to set it up yourself, but you can emulate basically any brush type you desire.

    Of less use to game art, but still occasionally valuable, Photoshop Touch has 16 built in adjustments like Black&White, Shadow/Highlight, etc.  There are also 30+ filters built in, such as Sharpen, Drop Shadow, Blur, Glass, Comic, Watercolor, Sephia, etc.  There are also an impressive number of manipulation tools tucked away in here for cropping, scaling, rotating, transforming(warping) and fairly solid text tools as well.

    Where Photoshop Touch really shines is layers.  You can have several layers, either new, cloned or imported from existing media.  Layer control is solid making it easy to move layers up, down, merge and delete as well as altering the opacity.  Additionally layers can be normal, darken, multiply, lighten, overly, subtracted, etc.  Fx can be limited to an individual layer. 

    While Photoshop Touch may not be the program you create your art in, it should probably be in your toolbox for the sheer amount of flexibility it gives you.  In terms of alterations and manipulation of images, it can’t really be touched.  The selection, copy/paste, import and layering tools are easily the best out of any tool I look at.

    In terms of getting your work out at the end of the day, unfortunately there is no direct Dropbox integration, but that isn’t really surprising given Adobe have their own cloud storage system, Creative Cloud.  In addition to their cloud offering, you can also save to the local photo roll.  There is however a Share option, allowing you to export the file ( as JPG, PSD, PSDX or PNG ) to just about any iPad application ( including dropbox ) or to email, printers, etc.  However the process is remarkably slow and sometimes simply doesn’t work.  At the end of the day, you can get just about anything in and out of Photoshop Touch that you would expect, but it can be awfully slow at times.

    I suppose it’s fair to point out, it’s actually Photoshop Touch I used to resize and export the screenshots from my iPad to my Mac while creating this post.  It’s just a handy tool to have.

     


     

    Autodesk Sketchbook Pro

    iTunes Link

    Cost: $3.99 for Pro Tools

    Screenshot(s):

    AutodeskSketchbook

     

    Comments:

    This product is a bit difficult for me to cover, as the version I have doesn’t actually seem to exist anymore.  At some point they moved from a premium iPad only product (Sketchbook Pro) to an freemium model, where you can download the base (Sketchbook Express), then for $3.99 unlock the premium tools.  I believe at the end of the day, they become the same product, but if there are minor differences, I apologize now.  As I am not entirely certain what is in the free vs pro edition, the below will be describing the complete purchased product.

    Sketchbook is exactly what the name suggests, a virtual sketchpad.  It’s an impressive one at that.  It’s got a minimal interface that get’s out of your way ( all of the things you see in the above screenshot are brought up by pressing the circular icon.  Let go and it’s just you and your drawing. Drawing tools are pretty typical with pen, pencil, market, highlighter, erase, smudge and airbrush available, plus the ability to choose custom brushes/stamps from probably 100+ presets, including common pencil type (2H, 8B, etc) and oddly enough, so clip art.  Responsiveness while drawing is instant.  Using a quick pop up tool you are able to alter your brushes dimensions and opacity with a single touch.  One nice feature, lacking from many similar products, is the ability to draw lines and shapes, although curves didn’t seem to work.

    There are a couple unique to Sketchbook features, of varying levels of usefulness.  There is a symmetry draw mode, enabling you to draw mirrored about a centre point.  You can also do time lapsed recording and collaborative sketching with someone else with their own copy of Sketchbook.  Sketchbook also has decent text creation abilities built in.  Most importantly (to me), Sketchbook also has layer support, although nowhere near that of Photoshop Touch.  Even just a single layer to enable tracing for animation is invaluable. 

    You can export from your gallery directly to the local photo gallery, to iTunes, email, etc… as well as directly to Dropbox.  You can create images up to 1800x2400 in size, although the size of image limits the number of layers.  A 1800x2400 image can for example have 4 layers, while a 768x1024 image can have up to 18 layers.  The largest image you are able to create is 2830x2830.  No idea why it stops there…  Even at that size, performance remains smooth.

    Sketchbook is a great product for creating sketches, the brushes are natural, performance is good and tools are complete enough to recreate most anything.  The interface is faster to navigate than Photoshop Touch, but it has a great deal less functionality, with absolutely no filters, effects, selection tools and minimal layer functionality.  For drawing however, I would take it over Photoshop Touch every day.


     

    Art Rage

    iTunes Link

    Cost: $4.99

    Screenshot(s):

    ArtRage

     

    Comments:

    This is the most applicably named application I have ever encountered!  It’s an amazing application for creating digital art, and it is horrifically rage inspiring!  ArtRage attempts to recreate real world art process digital, and does an incredibly good job of it.  You can choose your paper type (grain), metallic-ness then go to town using tools like paint, roller, trowel, crayons, markers, pens, erasers, pencils, airbrush and a couple different paint brushes.  For each brush you can set a number of settings specific to each tool such as pressure, thinning etc.  You really can recreate a very “painterly” feel.  So why the rage?

    Well that part is simple.  This application lags.  Always lags and I absolutely cannot use it for that reason.  Regardless to the complexity of your scene, your paint brush will always been a half a second behind where you are touching.  Of all the applications I looked at, this one had by far the worst performance.  If you can handle the delay while drawing, this application is certainly worth checking out, especially if you are looking for a natural media look.  I personally cannot get over the lag.

    From a technical perspective, Art rage allows a maximum canvas size of 2048x2048.  It supports layers with an absolute ton of blending modes.  There is no manipulation tools for selection, transformation nor any filters or effects.  This is a painting program focused on painting and nothing more.  It however probably does the best job of recreating brushes and paper in the digital world.  It has the ability to export to Dropbox as well as save locally, but not to send to other applications on your iPad.


     

    Bamboo Paper

    iTunes Link

    Cost: Free for Base + up to $3.99 to add tools

    Screenshot(s):

    BambooPaper

     

    Comments:

    Made by Wacom, famous for the titular Bamboo tablets.  The free version ships with a pen, then for 99 cents each, or $3.99 for all, you can add tools such as Brush, Crayon, Pencil etc.  It’s got a slick package, good export support (including Dropbox) and does feel like working in a notebook.

    That said, it’s simply too limited to be used for much more than sketching.  Lack of layer support, minimal dimension options, no selection tools, filters or advanced brushes.

     


     

    Paper

    iTunes Link

    Cost: Free then up to $6.99 for all tools

    Screenshot(s):

    Paper

    Comments:

    Paper is a somewhat famous application, as it has been used in Apple promotional materials.  It is also incredibly basic, basically just trying to mimic the drawing on paper experience.  As you can see from the screenshot above, I only have the free version installed.  For up to $6.99 you can add other art tools like a pencil, marker, paint brush, colour mixer, etc.  Export abilities are limited to save to camera roll and send to app.

    The drawing is nice and natural, but it’s too limited to be of much use for game development.  Additionally, it’s price is hard justified compared to similar applications.  Can’t really recommend paper other than for sketching if the minimal interface floats your boat.


     

    Skeches

    iTunes Link

    Cost: Free to start, up to $4.99 for all tools, plus text and layers

    Screenshot(s):

    Sketches

     

    Comments:

    Sketches is very similar to Paper and  Bamboo Paper, in that it emulates a classic sketchbook.  However the major exception is, with the premium purchase of $4.99 you gain among other things, layer support.  Additionally the free version includes a complete set of tools, but limits the customizability of each.  It contains all of the same tools as the previous two applications.  The interface can be minimized by swiping aside panels.  Navigation is multitouch based and to be honest is confusing as hell until you get used to it.

    You are able to export to a number of formats, including Dropbox.  You can select from a number of paper types, but unfortunately have very little control of resolution of the image, maxing out at that of a Retina iPad.

    Of all the sketch based drawing applications, this one was easily my favourite, even with it’s somewhat unnatural navigation interface. 


     

    Concepts

    iTunes Link

    Cost: Free to $6.99 for full toolset

    Screenshot(s):

    Concepts 

     

    Comments:

    Of all the applications I’ve covered yet, Concepts is probably the most unique, and in some ways, the most powerful.  Designed for creating sketches for concept art, it comes with several tools you haven’t seen yet.  For example, there is a tool for tracing lines and arcs.  There are snapping tools for snapping to the grid.  Speaking of which, the grid can be turned off, on, and set to a number of different densities and formats, including isometric, which can be invaluable if that is the art style you are going for.  There is full layering support, but they are intended for organization/tracing/layering and not artistic effects.  Beyond transparency, there are no blending options for layers.

    Artistic tools are somewhat limited to pens, pencils and markers.  More natural art style would be hard to achieve in this program as a result.  That said, the color system is amazing and emulates COPIC markers, allowing you to create pretty much the same tools that concept artists use.

    For precision works, this is hands down the best choice out there.  For drawing striaght edges, lines and curves, only the next option comes close.  For more painterly effects, this is a poor choice.  There is no filter or fx support.  Export support is robust, and actually capable of exporting to DXF ( Autocad ), SVG ( Vector ) and PSD formats.  You can also export as an image to the local camera roll, as well as export to Dropbox and others ( including somewhat shockingly, Adobe’s Creative Cloud ).

    If you are doing concept art, or going for a technical look, this is hands down your best choice.

     


     

    Adobe Illustrator Draw

    iTunes Link

    Cost: Free!

    Screenshot(s):

     AdobeDraw

    Comments:

    Adobe make a number of products of a very similar nature, Adobe Ideas, Adobe Lines and Adobe Sketch.  Adobe Draw however ties together the best of each of them and has some very interesting abilities.  By far and away the most important feature is the ability to use an angle or french curve ( like shown above ) to draw straight lines and curves.  The actual drawing features are somewhat limited, mostly pen/pencil style drawing implements.  You can control the brush tip size, colour and opacity and that’s it. There is layer support buts it’s tied to each tool somewhat oddly.  The response is quick, the interface is nice and clean and though limited, the brushes are different enough to be useful.

    All that said, this application is free.  It’s good and it’s free.  In some ways the drawing tools are amongst the best available.  The angle/french curve functionality is exceedingly well implemented, much better than the curve support in Concepts, which is the only other program that offers similar functionality.  Export functionality is fairly traditional, you can save to the local camera roll, upload to creative cloud and hit the standard share with targets, including Dropbox.  Unfortunately it seems you have little (no?) control over the canvas size.

    I don’t really understand the business model here, but free is a wonderful price.  Be sure to check this one out.

     


     

    Inkist

    iTunes Link

    Cost: Free *for a limited time, seemingly forever

    Screenshot(s):

    Inkist 

     

    Comments:

    I will be honest, I had a great deal of trouble navigating my way around this application.  Even saving a file was somewhat perplexing.  In many ways it has an interface like many desktop art packages like GIMP or Paintshop.  That interface doesn’t necessarily work on a touch device.

    There is actually a LOT of functionality packed in here, more so than most of the packages listed here, except perhaps Photoshop Touch. There is full layering support, but limited to 3 layers ( I think, who knows whats behind that interface that I couldn’t figure out! ), and all kinds of blending functionality between layers.  Art tools are somewhat limited.  I think everything you need is in here, but accessing it is somewhat of a trick.

    That said, it’s listed as free for a limited time, and that was over a year ago.  It doesn’t seem like this application is still being developed, so it’s a completely free option.  For that reason alone you should check it out, the interface might click for you better than it did me.  If nothing else, the price is right!

     


     

    Pixel Art Packages

     

    Sprite Something

    iTunes Link

    Cost: $4.99

    Screenshot(s):

    SpriteSomething

     

    Comments:

    This application is unique in the list as it is specifically aimed at low resolution ( 8/16bit ) pixel art.  At it’s core it’s a fat bit grid editor.  You draw pixel by pixel, although it does have some handy tools like fill, line drawing, etc. There is also layering ability, but there is no blending between layers, it’s literally just stacked pixels. You work in a massively zoomed in window, but you can preview the end result as you work.  There are also tools for doing frame by frame animation sequences, including onion skinning functionality.  This part of the interface can be a bit clunky.

    One very unique thing about sprite something is, it has a simple level editor built in as well.  See the video for more details.  Export is limited to email and local camera roll.  If you are working in fat bit pixel style, this is your best ( and almost only ) option. 

     


    Codea

    iTunes Link

    Cost: $9.99

    Screenshot(s):

    Codea 

     

    Comments:

    I’m just mentioning this one for thoroughness.  If you are reading this as part of the overarching iPad game creation tutorial, there is a simple pixel art example “Spritely” built into Codea.  Its another fat bit grid editor for pixel art.  It’s very simple but may be enough for you if you have simple requirements.

    Obviously not recommended to non-Codea users.

     


    Vector Graphics Packages

     

    Vector graphics applications work a bit differently than raster packages we described above ( except perhaps Concepts which is a cross between Raster and Vector graphics ).  Raster applications work on a pixel by pixel basis.  Vector graphics on the other hand work on mathematic formulas representing each brush stroke.  This gives you a bit less fine control over the end results, but allows you to scale up or down to any graphic resolution you want.

     

    Inkpad

    iTunes Link

    Cost: Free and Open Source

    Screenshot(s):

     Inkpad

    Comments:

    Completely free and open source, Inkpad is a powerful vector graphics package.  If you’ve ever used Inkscape on a PC, you know what you are in for.  You draw using paths, manipulate curves either straight line or bezier for curved edges and using simple geographic shapes, build, color and layer them to create more complex images. 

    Inkpad has full layer support, although they don’t really effect each other like in raster packages.  You can however bring in a standard graphic as a background or to trace over.  Inkscape supports saving as an image locally or exporting as PDF or SVG.

    Once again, it’s completely free.  Free is nice.

     

    iDraw

    iTunes Link

    Cost: $8.99

    Screenshot(s):

    IDraw

     

    Comments:

    iDraw has one of those iNames iAbsolutely iHate, but don’t judge the package by it’s name.  I absolutely love this package and strongly recommend it to anybody reading this that wants to work with vector graphics.  This application works very similar to Inkpad, except with more functionality, more polish and a higher price tag.  I have struggled in the past with vector graphics applications such as Inkscape ( unwieldy ) and Illustrator ( overwhelming ) and iDraw is the first one that just “clicked” for me.  Once again, the basic concept remains the same, you draw shapes using lines (paths), fill those paths with colors or gradiants, and layer them to make more complex shapes.  One major difference between this and Inkpad is the free form drawing tools, that allow you to use it much more similar to a traditional drawing package.

    iDraw is also available as a complete application on Mac and files are interchangeable.  This page has full layer support and is capable of saving directly to Dropbox.  Files can be exported as iDraw, PDF ( very very very useful with Codea as we will soon see ), SVG, PSD, PNG and JPEG, with resolutions of 72, 144 or 300dpi.

     

     

    Summary

     

    This is only a small subset of graphics packages available on iPad, but does represent a large cross section of them, as well as featuring most of the “big names”.

     

    Myself, if I were to only be able to keep a couple applications, my personal choices would be:

    • Photoshop Touch — for image manipulation, modification, effects and some creation
    • iDraw — Vector graphics made easy
    • Adobe Draw — Great sketching app, excellent line and curve support, completely free
    • Sketches — Most versatile drawing app with different brushes like watercolour, paint, etc
    • Concepts — Perfect for technical drawings, similar to Adobe Draw but much more technical, Copic integration
     
    If I had absolutely no budget available, I would most certainly recommend people download:
     
    • Sketches — For all your sketching needs, I’d pay for it, so free is awesome
    • Inkpad — Powerful vector graphics, completely free
    • Inkist — The interface is rather awful, but it gives you a lot of editing functionality, completely free
     
    All told, that represents under 20$ worth of purchases and provides a level of power way taken together that exceeds any desktop application at many times the price.  Even for a total spend of $0, you can end up with a remarkably complete 2D art package.

    Art , ,

    Month List

    DisqusCommentsSummary